Google Scholar For a similar rationale in different international contexts, see Gowa, Joanne, “ Anarchy, Egoism, and Third Images,” International Organization 40 (Winter 1986) CrossRef Google Scholar idem, “Bipolarity, Multipolarity and Free Trade, “ American Political Science Review 83 (December 1989) and Mandelbaum, Michael, The Fate of Nations ( New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988). Google Scholar For an application to the 1930s, see Posen, Barry, The Sources of Military Doctrine ( Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1984) Google Scholar for the postwar period, see Gaddis, John, The Long Peace: Inquiries into the History of the Cold War ( New York: Oxford University Press, 1987). For a game-theoretical perspective, see Oye, Kenneth A., ed., Cooperation under Anarchy ( Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986). For empirical evidence that bipolar systems are more stable, see Levy, Jack, “The Polarity of the System and International Stability: An Empirical Analysis,” in Sabrosky, Alan Ned, ed., Polarity and War ( Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1985), 54-58 Google Scholar, 66. 8 and Snyder, Glenn and Diesing, Paul, Conflict among Nations ( Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977) Google Scholar, chap. 1 On deductive reasoning for the stability of bipolar systems, see Waltz, Kenneth, “ The Stability of a Bipolar World,” Daedalus 93 ( 1964) Google Scholar idem, Theory of International Politics (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1979), chap.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |